Research Article

# A nonlocal multi-point multi-term fractional boundary value problem with Riemann-Liouville type integral boundary conditions involving two indices

Ahmed Alsaedi1, Sotiris K Ntouyas2, Ravi P Agarwal13 and Bashir Ahmad1*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia

2 Department of Mathematics, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, 451 10, Greece

3 Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, Kingsville, 78363-8202, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Advances in Difference Equations 2013, 2013:369  doi:10.1186/1687-1847-2013-369

 Received: 6 November 2013 Accepted: 1 December 2013 Published: 13 December 2013

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

### Abstract

In this paper, we study the existence of solutions for fractional differential equations of arbitrary order with multi-point multi-term Riemann-Liouville type integral boundary conditions involving two indices. The Riemann-Liouville type integral boundary conditions considered in the problem address a more general situation in contrast to the case of a single index. Our results are based on standard fixed point theorems. Some illustrative examples are also presented.

MSC: 26A33, 34A08.

##### Keywords:
fractional differential equations; nonlocal boundary conditions; fixed point theorems

### 1 Introduction

In the last few decades, the subject of fractional differential equations has become a hot topic for the researchers due to its intensive development and applications in the field of physics, mechanics, chemistry, engineering, etc. For a reader interested in the systematic development of the topic, we refer the books [1-6]. A fractional-order differential operator distinguishes itself from the integer-order differential operator in the sense that it is nonlocal in nature, that is, the future state of a dynamical system or process involving fractional derivative depends on its current state as well its past states. In other words, differential equations of arbitrary order describe memory and hereditary properties of various materials and processes. As a matter of fact, this characteristic of fractional calculus makes the fractional-order models more realistic and practical than the classical integer-order models. There has been a great surge in developing the theoretical aspects such as periodicity, asymptotic behavior and numerical methods for fractional equations. For some recent work on the topic, see [7-25] and the references therein. In particular, the authors studied nonlinear fractional differential equations and inclusions of arbitrary order with multi-strip boundary conditions in [21], while a boundary value of nonlinear fractional differential equations of arbitrary order with Riemann-Liouville type multi-strip boundary conditions was investigated in [22]. Sudsutad and Tariboon [26] obtained some existence results for an integro-differential equation of fractional order with m-point multi-term fractional-order integral boundary conditions.

In this paper, we study a boundary value problem of fractional differential equations of arbitrary order , with m-point multi-term Riemann-Liouville type integral boundary conditions involving two indices given by

(1.1)

where denotes the Caputo fractional derivative of order q, f is a given continuous function, , is the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order , , , , , and is such that

Here we emphasize that Riemann-Liouville type integral boundary conditions involving two indices give rise to a more general situation in contrast to the case of a single index [22]. Furthermore, the present work dealing with an arbitrary-order problem generalizes the results for the problem of order obtained in [26]. Several examples are considered to show the worth of the results established in this paper.

We develop some existence results for problem (1.1) by using standard techniques of fixed point theory. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we recall some preliminary facts that we need in the sequel, and Section 3 contains the main results. Section 4 provides some examples for the illustration of the main results.

### 2 Preliminaries from fractional calculus

Let us recall some basic definitions of fractional calculus [2-4].

Definition 2.1 For an at least n-times continuously differentiable function , the Caputo derivative of fractional order q is defined as

where denotes the integer part of the real number q.

Definition 2.2 The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order q is defined as

provided the integral exists.

Lemma 2.3For, the fractional boundary value problem

(2.1)

has a unique solution given by

(2.2)

where

(2.3)

Proof The general solution of fractional differential equations in (2.1) can be written as [4]

(2.4)

Using the given boundary conditions, it is found that , , …, . Applying the Riemann-Liouville integral operator on (2.4), we get

Using the concept of beta function, we find that

Now using the condition

we obtain

which yields

where δ is given by (2.3). Substituting the values of in (2.4), we obtain (2.2). This completes the proof. □

### 3 Main results

Let denote the Banach space of all continuous functions defined on endowed with a topology of uniform convergence with the norm .

To prove the existence results for problem (1.1), we need the following known results.

Theorem 3.1 (Leray-Schauder alternative [[27], p.4])

LetXbe a Banach space. Assume thatis a completely continuous operator and the set

is bounded. ThenThas a fixed point inX.

Theorem 3.2[28]

LetXbe a Banach space. Assume that Ω is an open bounded subset of Xwith, and letbe a completely continuous operator such that

ThenThas a fixed point in.

By Lemma 2.3, we define an operator as

(3.1)

Observe that problem (1.1) has a solution if and only if the associated fixed point problem has a fixed point.

For the sake of convenience, we set

(3.2)

Theorem 3.3Assume that there exists a positive constantsuch thatfor, . Then problem (1.1) has at least one solution.

Proof First of all, we show that the operator is completely continuous. Note that the operator is continuous in view of the continuity of f. Let be a bounded set. By the assumption that , for , we have

which implies that . Further, we find that

Hence, for , we have

This implies that is equicontinuous on . Thus, by the Arzela-Ascoli theorem, the operator is completely continuous.

Next, we consider the set

and show that the set V is bounded. Let , then , . For any , we have

Thus, for any . So, the set V is bounded. Thus, by the conclusion of Theorem 3.1, the operator has at least one fixed point, which implies that (1.1) has at least one solution. □

Theorem 3.4Let there exist a small positive numberτsuch thatfor, with, whereϑis given by (3.2). Then problem (1.1) has at least one solution.

Proof Let us define and take such that , that is, . As before, it can be shown that is completely continuous and

which, in view of the given condition , gives , . Therefore, by Theorem 3.2, the operator has at least one fixed point, which in turn implies that problem (1.1) has at least one solution. □

Our next result is based on Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative.

Lemma 3.5 (Nonlinear alternative for single-valued maps [[27], p.135])

LetEbe a Banach space, Cbe a closed, convex subset ofE, Ube an open subset ofCand. Suppose thatis a continuous, compact (that is, is a relatively compact subset ofC) map. Then either

(i) Fhas a fixed point in, or

(ii) there are (the boundary ofUinC) andwith.

Theorem 3.6Assume that

(A1) there exist a functionand a nondecreasing functionsuch that, ;

(A2) there exists a constantsuch that

Then boundary value problem (1.1) has at least one solution on.

Proof Consider the operator defined by (3.1). We show that maps bounded sets into bounded sets in. For a positive number r, let be a bounded set in . Then

Next we show that Fmaps bounded sets into equicontinuous sets of. Let with and , where is a bounded set of . Then we obtain

Obviously the right-hand side of the above inequality tends to zero independently of as . As satisfies the above assumptions, therefore it follows by the Arzelá-Ascoli theorem that is completely continuous.

Let x be a solution. Then, for , and following the similar computations as before, we find that

In consequence, we have

Thus, by (A2), there exists M such that . Let us set

Note that the operator is continuous and completely continuous. From the choice of V, there is no such that for some . Consequently, by the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder type (Lemma 3.5), we deduce that has a fixed point which is a solution of problem (1.1). This completes the proof. □

Finally we prove an existence and uniqueness result by means of Banach’s contraction mapping principle.

Theorem 3.7Suppose thatis a continuous function and satisfies the following assumption:

(A3) , , , .

Then boundary value problem (1.1) has a unique solution provided

(3.3)

whereϑis given by (3.2).

Proof With , we define , where and ϑ is given by (2.3). Then we show that . For , by means of the inequality , it can easily be shown that

Now, for and for each , we obtain

Note that ϑ depends only on the parameters involved in the problem. As , therefore is a contraction. Hence, by Banach’s contraction mapping principle, problem (1.1) has a unique solution on . □

### 4 Examples

In this section, we present some examples for the illustration of the results established in Section 3 by choosing the nonlinear function appropriately. Let us consider the following nonlocal boundary value problem:

(4.1)

where , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Using the given data, we find that

and

(a) As a first example, let us take

(4.2)

Observe that with . Thus the hypothesis of Theorem 3.3 is satisfied. Hence, by the conclusion of Theorem 3.3, problem (4.1) with given by (4.2) has at least one solution.

(b) Let us consider

(4.3)

For sufficiently small x (ignoring and higher powers of x), we have

Choosing , all the assumptions of Theorem 3.4 hold. Therefore, the conclusion of Theorem 3.4 implies that problem (4.1) with given by (4.3) has at least one solution.

(c) Consider

(4.4)

with and . Using , , we find by condition (A2) that , where . Thus all the assumptions of Theorem 3.6 are satisfied. Hence, it follows by Theorem 3.6 that problem (4.1) with defined by (4.4) has at least one solution.

(d) For the illustration of the existence-uniqueness result, we choose

(4.5)

Clearly, as and . Therefore all the conditions of Theorem 3.7 hold, and consequently there exists a unique solution for problem (4.1) with given by (4.5).

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Authors’ contributions

Each of the authors, AA, SKN, RPA and BA, contributed to each part of this work equally and read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

### Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

### References

1. Miller, KS, Ross, B: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Differential Equations, Wiley, New York (1993)

2. Samko, SG, Kilbas, AA, Marichev, OI: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives, Theory and Applications, Gordon & Breach, Yverdon (1993)

3. Podlubny, I: Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, San Diego (1999)

4. Kilbas, AA, Srivastava, HM, Trujillo, JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

5. Lakshmikantham, V, Leela, S, Vasundhara Devi, J: Theory of Fractional Dynamic Systems, Cambridge Academic Publishers, Cambridge (2009)

6. Baleanu, D, Diethelm, K, Scalas, E, Trujillo, JJ: Fractional Calculus: Models and Numerical Methods, World Scientific, Boston (2012)

7. Benchohra, M, Hamani, S, Ntouyas, SK: Boundary value problems for differential equations with fractional order and nonlocal conditions. Nonlinear Anal.. 71, 2391–2396 (2009). Publisher Full Text

8. Ahmad, B, Nieto, JJ: Existence of solutions for nonlocal boundary value problems of higher-order nonlinear fractional differential equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal.. 2009, Article ID 494720 (2009)

9. Agarwal, RP, Benchohra, M, Hamani, S: A survey on existence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations and inclusions. Acta Appl. Math.. 109, 973–1033 (2010). Publisher Full Text

10. Ahmad, B: Existence of solutions for irregular boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett.. 23, 390–394 (2010). Publisher Full Text

11. Balachandran, K, Trujillo, JJ: The nonlocal Cauchy problem for nonlinear fractional integrodifferential equations in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal.. 72, 4587–4593 (2010). Publisher Full Text

12. Baleanu, D, Mustafa, OG: On the global existence of solutions to a class of fractional differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl.. 59, 1835–1841 (2010). Publisher Full Text

13. Zhong, W, Lin, W: Nonlocal and multiple-point boundary value problem for fractional differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl.. 39, 1345–1351 (2010)

14. Gafiychuk, V, Datsko, B, Meleshko, V: Mathematical modeling of different types of instabilities in time fractional reaction-diffusion systems. Comput. Math. Appl.. 59, 1101–1107 (2010). Publisher Full Text

15. Ahmad, B, Nieto, JJ: Riemann-Liouville fractional integro-differential equations with fractional nonlocal integral boundary conditions. Bound. Value Probl.. 2011, Article ID 36 (2011)

16. Ahmad, B, Ntouyas, SK: A four-point nonlocal integral boundary value problem for fractional differential equations of arbitrary order. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.. 22, 1–15 (2011)

17. Cuevas, C, Soto, H, Sepulveda, A: Almost periodic and pseudo-almost periodic solutions to fractional differential and integrodifferential equations. Appl. Math. Comput.. 218, 1735–1745 (2011). Publisher Full Text

18. Ford, NJ, Morgado, ML: Fractional boundary value problems: analysis and numerical methods. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal.. 14(4), 554–567 (2011)

19. Ahmad, B, Ntouyas, SK: A note on fractional differential equations with fractional separated boundary conditions. Abstr. Appl. Anal.. 2012, Article ID 818703 (2012)

20. Aghajani, A, Jalilian, Y, Trujillo, JJ: On the existence of solutions of fractional integro-differential equations. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal.. 15(2), 44–69 (2012)

21. Ahmad, B, Ntouyas, SK: Nonlinear fractional differential equations and inclusions of arbitrary order and multi-strip boundary conditions. Electron. J. Differ. Equ.. 98, 1–22 (2012)

22. Ahmad, B, Ntouyas, SK, Alsaedi, A: A study of nonlinear fractional differential equations of arbitrary order with Riemann-Liouville type multi-strip boundary conditions. Math. Probl. Eng.. 2013, Article ID 320415 (2013)

23. Debbouche, A, Baleanu, D, Agarwal, RP: Nonlocal nonlinear integrodifferential equations of fractional orders. Bound. Value Probl.. 2012, Article ID 78 (2012)

24. Nyamoradi, N, Baleanu, D, Agarwal, RP: On a multipoint boundary value problem for a fractional order differential inclusion on an infinite interval. Adv. Math. Phys.. 2013, Article ID 823961 (2013)

25. Baleanu, D, Agarwal, RP, Mohammadi, H, Rezapour, S: Some existence results for a nonlinear fractional differential equation on partially ordered Banach spaces. Bound. Value Probl.. 2013, Article ID 112 (2013)

26. Sudsutad, W, Tariboon, J: Existence results of fractional integro-differential equations with m-point multi-term fractional order integral boundary conditions. Bound. Value Probl.. 2012, Article ID 94 (2012)

27. Granas, A, Dugundji, J: Fixed Point Theory, Springer, New York (2005)

28. Smart, DR: Fixed Point Theorems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980)