We investigate second-order half-linear differential equations with asymptotically almost periodic coefficients. For these equations, we explicitly find an oscillation constant. If the coefficients are replaced by constants, our main result (concerning the conditional oscillation) reduces to the classical one. We also mention examples and concluding remarks.
MSC: 34C10, 34C15.
Keywords:half-linear equations; oscillation theory; almost periodicity; asymptotic almost periodicity; conditional oscillation; oscillation constant
This paper is devoted to the study of the half-linear differential equation
where r, c are continuous functions, r is positive, and . An equation of this form appeared for the first time in . Nevertheless, as the basic pioneering papers in the field of half-linear differential equations, we mention [2,3]. During the last decades, these equations have been widely studied in the literature. A detailed description and a comprehensive literature overview concerning the topic can be found in  (see also [, Chapter 3]).
The name half-linear equations was introduced in . This term is motivated by the fact that the solution space of these equations is homogeneous (likewise in the linear case), but it is not additive. There are several differences between linear equations and half-linear equations. Especially, some tools widely used in the theory of linear equations are not available for half-linear equations (e.g., see  for the Wronskian identity and  for the Fredholm alternative). In fact, these differences are caused, more or less, by the lack of the additivity. On the other hand, many results from the theory of linear equations are extendable to their half-linear counterparts. Since the linear Sturmian theory extends verbatim to the half-linear case (for details, we refer to [, Section 1.2]), we can classify Eq. (1.1) as oscillatory or non-oscillatory. We say that Eq. (1.1) is oscillatory if zeros of any solution tend to infinity. Otherwise, Eq. (1.1) is called non-oscillatory.
In this paper, we analyze a topic from the theory of half-linear equations and, at the same time, from the theory of (asymptotically) almost periodic functions. The importance of the investigation of half-linear equations lies among others in the fact that various phenomena in physics and chemistry are studied through half-linear equations and through partial differential equations with p-Laplacian (half-linear equations can be regarded as equations with one-dimensional p-Laplacian). We refer to  and the last section of this paper (with references given therein). Similarly, many phenomena in nature have an oscillatory character and their models lead to the research of asymptotically almost periodic functions. There exist many remarkable books concerning (asymptotically) almost periodic differential equations and their applications. See, e.g., [10-12].
Actually, we are interested in the conditional oscillation of half-linear differential equations with asymptotically almost periodic coefficients. We say that the equation
with positive coefficients is conditionally oscillatory if there exists a constant such that Eq. (1.2) is oscillatory for all and non-oscillatory for . The constant Γ is called an oscillation constant (more precisely, oscillation constant ofcwith respect tor). For results about the conditional oscillation of half-linear equations, we refer to [13,14] and to [, Section 5.4.2] (see also ). The conditional oscillation of linear equations is studied, e.g., in [16,17].
Our goal is to find the explicit oscillation constant for Eq. (1.2), where and r, s are asymptotically almost periodic functions. We point out that the main motivation of our research comes from [14,17,18]. In [17,18], the oscillation constant is found for linear equations with periodic coefficients. Using the notion of the principal solution, the main result of  is generalized in , where periodic half-linear equations are considered. For the discrete counterpart, we refer to , where the problem is solved for linear difference equations with almost periodic coefficients. It means that the presented result is stronger than the known one in the discrete case because we consider asymptotically almost periodic half-linear equations.
We consider the asymptotically almost periodic functions r, s in Eq. (1.2), because the known results do not cover two important cases - the almost periodic case, which is the basic generalization of the pure periodicity in applications, and perturbations vanishing at infinity. In this sense, our result is superior to the results of [14,17,18].
Besides already given references, let us mention a short literature overview connected to the above announced result. The conditional oscillation of linear equations is treated in . We also refer to [20-23] which generalize . An oscillation criterion for second-order half-linear equations is proved, e.g., in . The oscillation properties of second-order linear dynamic equations are studied in  and the oscillation and non-oscillation behavior of second-order half-linear dynamic equations is investigated in [26-28].
The oscillation of solutions of almost periodic linear equations is discussed in [29-31]. In , half-linear equations with (the Besicovitch) almost periodic coefficients are considered and an oscillation theorem is obtained. In , a necessary and sufficient condition for a second-order equation with the Besicovitch almost periodic coefficient to be oscillatory is given. Oscillation properties of these equations are mentioned in [, Section 3.5] and [, Section 5.3.3] as well. Other properties of half-linear equations with almost periodic coefficients are treated, e.g., in .
The paper is organized as follows. The notion of asymptotic almost periodicity is recalled in the next section. Necessary background from the theory of half-linear equations is presented in Section 3. In these two sections, we mention only basic definitions and results which we will use later. In Section 4, we prove the main result and we illustrate it by some examples. Our paper is finished by concluding remarks given in Section 5.
2 Asymptotic almost periodicity
At first, we recall the definition of almost periodicity.
Definition 1 A continuous function is called almost periodic if for every , there exists a number with the property that any interval of length of the real line contains at least one point s for which
Note that we mentioned the so-called Bohr definition of almost periodic functions and that it is possible to introduce almost periodic functions in different ways. As the basic definition of almost periodic functions in the literature, one can often find the Bochner definition which is equivalent with the Bohr one and which is embodied in the next theorem.
Theorem 2.1Letbe a continuous function. Thenfis almost periodic if and only if from any sequence of the form, whereare real numbers, one can extract a subsequence which converges uniformly with respect to.
Proof See, e.g., [, Theorem 1.14]. □
As a direct generalization of almost periodicity, we consider the notion of asymptotic almost periodicity.
Again, equivalent definitions of asymptotic almost periodicity (based on the Bohr and Bochner concept) are used in the literature. We formulate them in the following two theorems. For the proofs of these theorems, we refer to [, Theorem 9.3, parts 2), 4)] (see also [, Theorem 1.5.2]).
Theorem 2.3A continuous functionis asymptotically almost periodic if and only if from any sequence of the form, whereare positive real numbers satisfying, one can extract a subsequence which converges uniformly with respect to.
Now we mention two well-known common properties of almost periodic and asymptotically almost periodic functions, which we will need later. To prove them, it suffices to consider Theorems 2.1 and 2.3 (or consider, e.g., the proof of [, Theorem 1.9]).
Corollary 2.2The sum and the product of two (asymptotically) almost periodic functions are (asymptotically) almost periodic.
Since asymptotically almost periodic functions are evidently bounded, from Corollary 2.1, we also obtain the following.
Corollary 2.3Iffis an asymptotically almost periodic function satisfying
It remains to recall the notion of the mean value for asymptotically almost periodic functions.
Theorem 2.4Iffis an asymptotically almost periodic function, then the limit
3 Half-linear differential equations
To prove the main result, we use the concept of the Riccati equation for half-linear equations. More precisely, applying the transformation
to Eq. (1.1), we obtain the half-linear Riccati equation
We also need the following two theorems. The first one is a well-known consequence of the half-linear Roundabout theorem which is proved, e.g., in [, Theorem 1.2.2] (or see directly [, Theorem 2.2.1]). For the second one, we can refer to [, Theorem 2.2.3].
Theorem 3.2Suppose that
and that Eq. (1.1) is non-oscillatory. Then the lower limit
if and only if
for every solutionwof Eq. (3.1).
We focus our attention to Eq. (1.1) in the form
i.e., we obtain the so-called adapted Riccati equation
In fact, we will use only partial cases of Theorems 3.1 and 3.2. For reader’s convenience, we mention the corresponding corollaries for Eq. (3.5) and Eq. (3.7).
Proof We apply Theorem 3.2, where (3.2) is satisfied (consider the boundedness of r). Inequality (3.3) is valid, because r, s are positive functions and . Thus, (3.4) holds for all solutions w of Eq. (3.6). Let us consider an arbitrary solution w of Eq. (3.6) defined on satisfying (see Theorem 3.1). We know that w is decreasing which follows immediately from (3.6). By combination of (3.2) and (3.4), we obtain as . Especially, , . This observation implies the existence of a negative solution ζ of Eq. (3.7) on . □
Proof The statement of the corollary follows directly from Theorem 3.1. □
4 Oscillation constant
Now we can formulate and prove the announced result.
Consider the equation
The existence of such numbers follows from Corollary 2.3, Theorem 2.4, and Remark 1. We denote
Let . By contradiction, we suppose that Eq. (4.3) is non-oscillatory. Corollary 3.1 says that the adapted Riccati equation has a negative solution ζ, which exists on some interval . Without loss of generality, we can assume that . We recall (see (3.7))
Especially, we know that
In addition, considering (4.8) and (4.10), we have
We also put
which follows from Young’s inequality.
Next, applying (4.4), (4.5), and (4.6), we compute
Using the fact that this function has the Lipschitz property and using (4.14), we obtain
which implies that
In the second part of the proof, we have to show that Eq. (4.3) is non-oscillatory for . We will consider arbitrarily given and the solution ζ of the adapted Riccati equation determined by the Cauchy problem (4.8), , where
As in the first part of the proof (see (4.9)), we can estimate
We prove that for some and for all considered . On the contrary, we will assume that such a number δ does not exist. This assumption implies the existence of such that and . We estimate the value by the following expression:
and, consequently, we obtain
We consider T, α as sufficiently large numbers for which (4.4) and (4.5) are satisfied. Analogously, we can require that T and α are so large that
Therefore, using (4.4), (4.5), and (4.6), we have
Similarly as in the first part of the proof (see (4.22)), we can show
Finally, considering (4.23), (4.24), (4.25), and (4.26), we obtain the following contradiction:
Remark 2 Our result is ‘backward compatible’ with previous results about the conditional oscillation of half-linear equations. More precisely, if the functions r and s in Eq. (4.3) are α-periodic ones (with the same period α), our constant Γ reduces to the one from . If they are replaced by constants , then , which gives the classical result for half-linear Euler-type equations (see, e.g.,  or [, Section 1.4.2]).
Corollary 4.1Consider the equation
If the functions r and s in Eq. (4.27) are periodic with the same period, then the oscillation constant given in (4.28) reduces to the known one (see ). For constant functions r, s, we obtain , which corresponds to the famous result of Kneser . Note that the main result of  cannot be used for general periodic functions r, s (which do not have any common period). This situation is illustrated by the following example.
Hence, we obtain the oscillation constant
5 Concluding remarks
Such functions can be constructed using, e.g., [, Theorem 3.1]. Based on this fact, we conjecture that there exist almost periodic functions , , , satisfying (4.1) such that Eq. (4.3) determined by the coefficients , and (see (4.2)) is oscillatory and Eq. (4.3) with the coefficients , and is non-oscillatory. Thus, in general, we conjecture that it is not possible to decide whether Eq. (4.3) is oscillatory or non-oscillatory for .
is a non-oscillatory majorant of Eq. (4.3) (consider (4.1), (4.7)).
Since the asymptotic almost periodicity of a function f implies the asymptotic almost periodicity of (consider, e.g., Corollary 2.1), we can also apply Theorem 4.1 in the case when the function s in Eq. (4.3) changes its sign. More precisely, for Eq. (4.3) with and asymptotically almost periodic functions r and s, we obtain the following result by the Sturm comparison theorem. If,, and, then Eq. (4.3) is non-oscillatory.
Let us illustrate the connection between (ordinary) half-linear differential equations analyzed in this paper and partial differential equations with p-Laplacian. We refer, e.g., to [38-41]. For example, consider the equation
where , is a continuous non-zero n-vector function, A is an elliptic matrix function with differentiable components, c is a Hölder continuous function, and div, ∇, , and stand for the divergence operator, the nabla operator, the Euclidean norm, and the usual scalar product in , respectively. Let , , dσ be the element of the surface of the sphere , and be the smallest eigenvalue of the matrix . According to [, Theorem 1], we have the following result. If the functions
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The authors declare that the research was realized in collaboration with the same responsibility and contributions. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The first author is supported by Grant P201/10/1032 of the Czech Science Foundation. The second author is supported by the Operational Programme ‘Education for Competitiveness (POSTDOC II.)’ under the project CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0037. The project is co-financed by the European Social Fund and the state budget of the Czech Republic.
Beesack, PR: Hardy’s inequality and its extensions. Pac. J. Math.. 11(1), 39–61 (1961). Publisher Full Text
Mirzov, JD: On some analogs of Sturm’s and Kneser’s theorems for nonlinear systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl.. 53(2), 418–425 (1976). Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1007/s10231-010-0155-0Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1007/BF02907054Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1007/s002200050822Publisher Full Text
Schmidt, KM: Oscillation of perturbed Hill equation and lower spectrum of radially periodic Schrödinger operators in the plane. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.. 127(8), 2367–2374 doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-99-05069-8 (1999)
doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-99-05069-8Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1002/mana.19981890108Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1016/j.jde.2010.06.018Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1016/j.jde.2008.06.004Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2007.10.007Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0600-8Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1016/j.aml.2010.04.019Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1080/10236190290015317Publisher Full Text
doi:10.2478/s12175-010-0009-7Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1155/S1085337504306251Publisher Full Text
doi:10.2307/2047418Publisher Full Text
doi:10.2307/2046511Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1216/rmjm/1181072154Publisher Full Text
Sugie, J, Hata, S: Global asymptotic stability for half-linear differential systems with generalized almost periodic coefficients. Monatshefte Math.. 166(2), 255–280 doi:10.1007/s00605-011-0297-1 (2012)
doi:10.1007/s00605-011-0297-1Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1007/BF01444165Publisher Full Text
Kusano, T, Jaroš, J, Yoshida, N: A Picone-type identity and Sturmian comparison and oscillation theorems for a class of half-linear partial differential equations of second order. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl.. 40(1-8), 381–395 doi:10.1016/S0362-546X(00)85023-3 (2000)
doi:10.1016/S0362-546X(00)85023-3Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.05.015Publisher Full Text
doi:10.1016/S0362-546X(00)00136-XPublisher Full Text